Welcome!

A very brief background on the Comedy-Recycling theory:

Back in late 1978-early 1979, I was wondering why gravity still emanated from a black hole, when light {and spin and electrical charge} did not..  In my quest to search for a reasonable answer, I re-considered an idea from Einstein, which had been known about, but was still "hidden in plain sight" for many years.   He said that matter bent or curved spacetime, and that warped spacetime, in turn, told matter how to move.

The curvature concept is similar to a person jumping onto an undisturbed  trampoline surface, changing the shape of a grid of squares drawn on the unstretched surface.  One could also think-of a grid, drawn on the curved surface of a loosely-filled water balloon.  Push down a dulled pencil lightly, to change the shape (curvature) of the balloon’s surface.

I noticed that in both cases, the curvature (shape of the surface) changed with respect to the amount of the weight or pressure placed upon either the trampoline or the balloon.  NOTE: Once it was changed, NO additional energy (or action) was continually needed to maintain the curvature unless the shape changed in response to say—a jumping person or pushing the pencil down or pulling it up.  Note also: even if the pencil is rotated or was constantly spinning, the curvature’s shape would not change with time.

This suggested to me that curvature, a geometric-like effect [or more correctly a metric-like effect], would already be established outside the mass of a black hole, WITHOUT NEEDING either electromagnetic energy or gravitons, (the hypothetical carriers of the gravitational force) to travel at (or above) the speed of light. 

Somehow, I came upon the idea that curvature “modulates”, influences or changes the real-time energy level contained in matter.  Consider that time actually decreases (slows down) in a greater gravitational field, or speeds-up when matter is in a lesser gravitational field.  If this is so, then the energy content of matter literally changes as mass is lifted-up, or decreases as energy is freed-out as kinetic energy.  In either case, the mass itself “keeps-track-of” it’s own energy, and gravity never brings-in or takes-away the energy

UNNOTICED FACT: What is so important about the above idea is the dilemmas that it helps to solve.  It really explains why gravity exists outside of the Black-Hole ^C-R and why the Black-Hole ^C-R cannot collapse into a singularity.

Second unnoticed fact: This approach also explains what limits gravity, and places real barriers to gravity’s influence.  Once curvature (or time) has been lowered completely, gravity loses any additional influence

This curvature-concept nicely answered my original question, “Why is gravity still felt outside the black hole?”  Closer examination of this concept of “curvature” causing “gravity” as more-of an after-effect led me to discover (or uncover) many remarkable NEW ideas.

Next: If you, the reader, note the effect of an increase of curvature (squeezing) on half of a juicy orange, you will detect an increase in fluids emitted with every increase in pressure applied, up to a point. There will come a time when absolutely no more fluid (orange juice) can be squeezed-out.

Let us now consider the effect of gravity upon matter. Notice that as matter falls into greater curvature, kinetic energy (speed) is released, until the matter hits something or is prevented from falling further. The suggestion here is: increasing “gravitational” curvature forces-out some energy contained in all matter. The kinetic energy has come-out, only from a decrease in the overall energy-content of the matter.  This energy is in DIRECT proportion to the decrease in real-time, and the increase in curvature.  In the simplest words, matter has decreased it's energy-content, in real-time, by the exact amount equal to the same amount of kinetic energy (from the acceleration, or speed) released. [This kinetic energy would have been converted to heat if the matter had hit something or gone splat.]  

The difference in energy EXACTLY equals either the gain or loss of time

 (delta r t) times mc² from the starting mass, or:

The equivalent energy of the masses energy before equals the energy of the mass afterward, plus (or minus) the energy released/ or gained [conservation of energy is always maintained, nothing comes for free, the price for the “gravitational” energy gained is paid-for, in full, from the total original energy of the mass itself]

(the mass _b4 ) times (c _b4)² = [ mass _after (c _after)² ] + all of the kinetic energy released

A radical, and radial idea:

  Note: Either the quantity of mass-m or the quantity of the speed-of-light-c will decrease slightly with the slow-down of time, to make-up the difference.  Presently, we do not have sophisticated enough measuring tools to measure these minuscule changes.  The changes would be more substantial if we could travel to a different location, either the Great Attractor, or near the outer edges of the universe.

The energy-value of all mass decreases as the radius increases, emerging from the center. (From 100% at the center, to 0% at the Schwarzschild radius.)

Tech Note: The gain in time on earth’s surface is approximately 1 part in 10¹⁶ th per meter of elevation.

Newly claimed, while in greater curvature, the same matter entering into stronger gravity has less energy after “gaining” speed, by that exact-same amount as was gained. This difference in energy IS EXACTLY the same amount as:

  [the change in real-time, )] times [ (the mass) times c ² ].

In the simplest concept, 1 Kg of lead (or any other matter), when transported to the outer edges of the universe is worth much less total energy than that same mass would have after being transported to here, on earth.  The exact energy difference would be the amount of energy you would need to expend to move the matter from point A to point B.  

“Oh, the TIMES, they are a changin’ ”  (to quote a famous Bob Dylan song.)

The difference in real-time, at the outer edges of the universe, and the real-time, here, on earth, will cause the end-result to be worth EXACTLY the same energy (gravitationally) added, to “lift” the matter from there to here. 

{HINT: It is as if Gravity-curvature puts “the squeeze” on matter}

NOTE: Gravity did NOT produce the energy, rather, the change in gravitational curvature changed the “ability” of matter to “store” energy while in a certain time-frame. [Somewhat similar to  adjusting the width of metal plates “confining” a sponge to adjust its absorbing capacity, or its ability to hold a fluid.]

The same 1 Kg of lead would be worth even more energy at the "Great Attractor".  Notice: The “force” of “gravity” never needs to keep track of the energy-content of each mass.  Rather, each “mass” takes it's own energy with it. [Something like: a car traveling with it’s gas tank changing between full and empty and full as you fill it, then empty it by driving around and expending energy.]

Contrary to one assumption from the theory of relativity, there IS a “preferred” reference frame superimposed over this or any “closed-off” universe, by gravity (actually, by the curvature).  When we see a highly-red -shifted object near the edges of the universe, we see that object as it was, in real-time.  It really IS ACTUALLY as it appears to us.  It is slowed-down (time-wise) significantly as compared to us.  Similarly, an object at the "Great Attractor" is actually more energetic, existing in a faster timeframe, and it appears to be blue-shifted as compared to us here on earth.

Significantly, any photon emitted from an object near the outer edges of the universe DOES NOT (continuously) CHANGE it's energy level when traveling towards earth.  Rather, our “time-frame” here on earth IS significantly faster.  When we measure the photon from "there", it does not measure the same as a photon emitted "here".

Simply, this means that there is an overall “real-time” reference frame superimposed over everything in this universe!!  This also means that the space we SEE is not isotropic, or the same in all directions.  And that IS WHAT we actually SEE.

AFTER correcting the results (the DATA) on the observed red-shifts, science claims there is NO DIFFERENCE in what we SEE at a distance.  I am reminded of the Chico Marx quote: “Who you gonna believe, me” (as in: the theory of relativity) “or your own two eyes?” (The author’s addition in parenthesis and italics for the analogy.)   Sadly, science has chosen to believe the theory of relativity, instead of the observed VISUAL EVIDENCE, as seen in plain sight.

This also means that: our universe is NOT expanding, and is NOT expanding at an expanding rate, either.  Rather, the experiments done to come to that conclusion were flawed significantly in ONE underlying assumption.  The experiment(ers) assumed that "there" was the same as "here", time-wise.

I would predict (without yet having done the math or analyzed the specific data) if the Cepheid variable study was re-analyzed, with the real-time factor restored, and not corrected (and not interpreted as acceleration away from us), the data will fit fine with a relatively "static" universe.

A significant note: Conventional gravity theories cannot prevent a static universe from completely collapsing, there is no preventive measure to forbid it.  Using the new idea from the Comedy-Recycling theory, one can easily see that, matter located at the outer edges of the universe IS ALREADY at a lower energy state, there, than it would be HERE on earth.

 Astoundingly, (by using the preferred reference frame concept) the matter there would have to GAIN or acquire additional real-time energy to COLLAPSE inward, back into a higher-energy neighborhood.  By noticing the features, as they are observed in OUR universe, the C-R theory used those features as a "laboratory model or role-model" of the only "Inside of a Black-Hole ^C-R " we (humanity) will probably ever get to explore.

All properties attributed to the insides of all Black-Holes ^C-R were derived from observing our universe, with the exception of the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  The concept of the Neutral Zone ^C-R has been derived from other simple ideas common to several real world phenomena.

New terms used in the C-R theory are: Black-Hole ^C-R : This double capitalized, hyphenated, and post-superscripted "Brand Name" Black-Hole ^C-R is used to denote C-R theory obeying black holes.

Conventional black holes DO NOT EXIST as described in popular literature, and will be referred to only for discussion or ridicule purposes.  All properties described will be more extensively covered in the claims section, in the Extended Definitions sections, and in various areas of the C-R theory (listed here _____).

C-R theory Black-Holes ^C-R cannot collapse into a singularity.  All Black-Holes ^C-R must have an EXACTLY critical, fully enclosed Active Zone ^C-R at their center.  [This is something like a placeholder, or a structure inside, that establishes the Black-Hole ^C-R in the first place]  Gravitational curvature at the exact center of each Black-Hole ^C-R is always minimum.

Any Black-Hole ^C-R which has swallowed matter or energy will store these in a shell-like, thin-walled volume the C-R theory calls the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  This Neutral Zone ^C-R is the real heart of the Black-Hole ^C-R.  No energy needs to be expended or radiated to maintain the strength of “gravity” (which is actually caused or implemented by the gravitational curvature) outside the Black-Hole ^C-R.  All matter swallowed by the Black-Hole ^C-R then stored in the Neutral Zone ^C-R is confined in a totally inactive state.  It is forbidden to interact, radiate, decay, or communicate in any way with other matter or with energy as long as it remains inside the Neutral Zone ^C-R. The Black-Hole ^C-R seizes, sorts and consumes sub-atomic matter predominantly by mass. (Imagine that!!)  Most electrons manage to escape consumption after the proton or proton-neutron rich nucleus passes through, into the IB³ Schwarzschild radius. 

Note: Every active, matter eating Black-Hole ^C-R is storing-up and concentrating, in an inactivated state, the ONLY KNOWN force which can OVERCOME GRAVITY in real world situations.  Simply stated, the Neutral Zone ^C-R is filled with inactivated, self-repelling excess protons (positive charges).

After the Neutral Zone ^C-R has stored-up excess protons for a long time, a process not unlike cranking a child's Jack-in-the-box to “free” the Jack trapped-inside will occur.  These anti-Black-Hole ^C-R events can range, in an  order of increasing magnitude, a nova, a supernova, a hypernova, a Seyfert galaxy, a quasar, a gamma ray burst (GRB), and I used-to think, even the big bang itself.

Active Zone ^C-R: The Active Zone ^C-R is a necessary part of the inside of every Black-Hole ^C-R.  In the Active Zone ^C-R all speed-of-light interactions are permitted (unlike the Neutral Zone ^C-R).  Technically, outside of all known Black-Holes ^C-R, our universe exists.  It also appears to be an inside Active Zone ^C-R.  All “speed-of-light critical” interactions and activities are permitted within an Active Zone ^C-R.  The inside Active Zone ^C-R could also be considered a placeholder to help prevent the Black-Hole ^C-R from collapsing into a singularity.

IB³-Schwarzschild radius: The C-R theory has added the term IB³ to the front of the term Schwarzschild radius.  The IB³ term is short for 3 extra properties the C-R theory adds this NEW IMPROVEMENT to the idea or the concept of the Black-Hole ^C-R: the Isolation Boundary, the Insulation Boundary, and the Information Boundary.

Although conventional theories also use the term Schwarzschild radius, the C-R theory adds the following concepts: There is always a complete Active Zone ^C-R inside every Schwarzschild radius, and there is also an outer Schwarzschild radius at the outside of each Neutral Zone ^C-R.  Between the 2 Schwarzschild radii all matter and energy is stored-up, confined, or trapped in a time frozen, inactivated state.

Somewhat akin to matter stored at absolute zero—temperature wise, matter inside the Neutral Zone ^C-R is, energy-wise, at it’s lowest possible state.  It also is time-wise in it’s minimum energy state.  All real time “speed-of-light” interactions will be prevented, turned-off, or inactivated.  It will be inactive, infinitely electrically insulated, and informationally isolated from other matter and energy there in the Neutral Zone ^C-R, and any matter and energy anywhere else. 

All “speed-of-light” interaction, communication, exchanges, and knowledge is forbidden, or more accurately, turned-off, and inactivated.  The only exception is the (geo)metric-like influence of the curvature, as contributed by the total mass: the sum of mass from the Neutral Zone ^C-R plus the mass from the complete Active Zone ^C-R inside.   The momentum of the total Black-Hole ^C-R might be measurable from the outside, but would require tools beyond our present visual capabilities to be precise.

Neutral Zone ^C-R: This Neutral Zone ^C-R concept was discussed somewhat in the terms above, but briefly represents any shell-like volume of space where the gravitational escape velocity exceeds the speed-of-light.  There is no possible collapse of matter, once inside this Neutral Zone ^C-R of “falling” further inward, into a singularity. {Curvature, the real CAUSE of gravity, has ALREADY done ALL that it can do to LOWER the ENERGY of matter to it’s LOWEST potential!!!}

ANALOGY: The Neutral Zone ^C-R is to both gravity and time what absolute zero is to temperature.  The minimum-energy possible state of existence.  No additional energy can be extracted, by any means, ever!!!!  The energy-content of matter trapped here can only increase later, someday, after the curvature of this volume goes back below the escape velocity of the speed-of-light, then energy can be added. HINT: Only a catastrophic release event can accomplish this action.

WARPED THINKING:

Matter cannot absorb any energy while matter resides is in the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  Quite interestingly, time-trapped energy (as photons or resonance-waves) can exist within the Neutral Zone ^C-R, but they still cannot interact in any way. HINT: Think of the photons as orbiting or resonating “out of the plane”, or at right angles to our normal directions, i.e., the path that light would normally travel, from A to B.

Forget despair and hopelessness, though.  The very properties that the Neutral Zone ^C-R uses to shut down “real-time interactions” are a KEY new concept originating out of the C-R theory, explaining the technical details in the practical recycling of matter and energy in the universe!!!

The ability of Black-Holes ^C-R to recycle and renew matter and energy will be further covered in the upcoming chapters.  Many of the unexpected but unique interconnections using THE EXISTING properties of the matter and energy within this universe will be explored more thoroughly.  There will be many explanations of existing, known phenomenon, which will be shown to fit-in very nicely into a C-R theory type universe.

I do apologize in advance that the C-R theory does not agree with many of the almost universally accepted concepts common to conventional theories.  Most of the older C-R theory readers will never be able to change their viewpoint enough to fully appreciate or to accept the advantages gained using the Comedy-Recycling theory techniques.

I have designed this presentation to appeal mostly to those younger individuals who have not yet made up their minds that "it can not be done that way". [Not primarily for the academic professionals who have been teaching the opposite (conventional) ideas for so long because they were taught that way, and they now believe those ideas fundamentally.]

I could not write the C-R theory "believed" [not just believable, but already accepted as fact], so I wrote it funny.

I would suggest, for the average incoming, new reader, do not try to believe this theory upon your first reading!  Read it as you would read a fake, a fable, a fairy-tale, a fantasy, a (science) fiction.  This will free-up your natural inclination to think: “This is not what I have been taught”!  My hope is that, given 5 or 10 years into the future, after initially rejecting these ideas, some of those who have read this theory will be continually amazed, as I have been the last 30+ years, of the incredibly easy "real-world-fit" this theory seems to have.

((Place a hyperlink here to the short list of phenomenon which take on a new meaning, and should seem to fit-in to a plan if the C-R theory ideas are true, as soon as it becomes available.))

The abundance, in this universe, of high-energy positive charges (cosmic rays), excess electrons flowing from the sun, through earth, into space (1,000,000+ amps) in the Aurora, the multiple positive-ionizations found and persisting for thousands of years, in the ejecta of the supernova, quasar, and Seyfert galaxy remnants, the complete ionization of the outer 1/5 of this universe’s shell of the hydrogen atoms (as ions), and the presence of polarized light (in almost every direction), indicating enormous current flows (and/or magnetic fields), ALL take on a simplicity, from a set of causes unique to ONLY the C-R theory.  A natural cause for the appearance of “The Great Attractor”, and what it means is also easily explained by the C-R theory. 

I welcome any reader to put this theory to every imaginable test, in every imaginable scenario.  Please let me know if you find any phenomenon, or any experimental result which would seem to invalidate any part of this theory. 

Note: There may be some interpretations of the raw data, the experimenters "spin" on the view of what was seen or detected, that may be presented in such a way that the conclusions from that view disagree with the C-R theory’s view.

Some "easy" potential experiments to test the C-R theory will be covered later on in the appendix, and in one of the chapters.

Note: I said easy, not QUICK, not CHEAP, and not necessarily with today's technology and limitations.  There may be one unexpected aspect of gravity’s behavior which can be tested within 20 years or more, with existing technology.

I would like to start including some reader's letters and comments near the end of the web-site. I will not include anything unless you specifically state in your letters or e-mails that you don't mind if I post the results.

Note: I may edit the letters or questions for clarity, brevity, and language.  I will attempt to credit any responders in first-in, first credited, and I will try to be fair to anyone who disagrees with me.

I started out not believing any of the C-R theory views at first, but slowly "adopted" the C-R theory concepts as my own, but only after they started to made sense to me.  I am still making new discoveries from the C-R theory.  I am still changing, adapting and revising my old, original, conventional beliefs, and adopting a more "pro-C-R theory" viewpoint.  Since I, too, used to believe those more conventional views, I can both sympathize and empathize with those individuals who were too well taught to easily surrender or abandon those views.

If I do detect, or suspect that I am not on track with the C-R theory, or if I am proved wrong in some area, or even if I have reasonable doubts, I will try to explain that to you, the readers, too.

Feel free to believe any of these new areas you choose, and reject any you cannot accept right now.  Incorporate any of these ideas you like into your own beliefs, or your life's experiences.  They either ARE true, or they ARE NOT.

Both the C-R theory, and all conventional theories have the same simple goal; to allow us all to more-fully understand our universe, and the multitude of diverse processes we have detected, measured, and observed. 

If some or all of the C-R theory ideas should be found to be wrong, then we will know of another way that nature does not work.  If, on the other hand, any of these new ideas are right, I am confident that they have not ever been properly considered by conventional scientists.  These ideas were simply thought to be already excluded, ruled-out, and decided-against, or pre-rejected, if you will.  I am attempting to “gently” show that these ideas may have more merit than was ever considered possible.  I will try to explain why they might make sense, and why they might reveal a side of nature, and the true-workings of this universe that has never been suspected.

I hope that most who read this theory will find it funny, thought provoking, and reasonable.  I accept that many who will read this are too well "trained or taught" in current ideas.  They cannot now change their beliefs enough to allow them to shift their thought-processes to experience or appreciate the C-R theory viewpoint.  For those who can accept these new ideas, please help those not understanding these ideas to look in a fresh new way.

If The C-R theory helps even one person to understand the workings in our universe in a simpler, better way, or to appreciate the pre-planning and the intricate wisdom of their Creator more, I will accept that.  If it helps you, the individual reader, that is even better.

Sincerely

Jerry A. Reynard

((Make a brief summary of statements, about the unique ideas supported by the C-R theory.))

HERE IS A BRIEF LIST OF NEW IDEAS FROM THE C-R THEORY:

Curvature IS the real cause of gravity.  Virtually the entire C-R theory concept is based-upon that NEW understanding.  Mainstrean science HAS MISSED this relationship completely.

The Black-Hole ^C-R never collapses into a singularity.

There is always a complete, closed-off, universe-like region, The Active Zone ^C-R, inside every Black-Hole ^C-R!!!  This Active Zone ^C-R acts something like a place-holder, also preventing collapse.

Because curvature exists as something-like a framework, this CAUSES the effect of gravity outside of the Black-Hole ^C-R.

Black-Holes ^C-R sort and consume mass, swallowing both protons and neutrons, but also isolating, insulating, and inactivating the electrical charges of the protons.

Almost ALL electrons are freed outside of the Black-Holes ^C-R.  If the Black-Hole ^C-R is eating, it will leave evidence of excess electrons escaping from it’s vicinity.

There is NO radiation at the speed-of-light EVER exiting from a Black-Hole ^C-R.  Not even one photon per billion years escapes from the Neutral Zone ^C-R, while it is intact.

This specifically means that there is NO HAWKING RADIATION, either.

(As a consolation prize, however, this makes the Black-Hole 100% thermodynamically efficient, to allow re-concentrating, renewing, and refreshing matter and energy.)

Only a catastrophic failure, a release event, will allow the Black-Hole ^C-R to explosively free it’s contents.  Possibly a Coronal Mass Ejection (CME), definitely a nova, supernova, Seyfert galaxy, active galaxy, quasar, and a gamma ray burst (GRB) are increasing versions of the same-type event.

HINT: Look for sustained multiple positive ionizations, featuring ions from +5 to +23, to continue over thousands of years, if not millions of years.

Our universe is a closed universe, exactly critical, always containing exactly enough mass to close-off this universe.  Because of the preferred reference frame, the outer regions are worth less energy, and are NOT ALLOWED to collapse inward, unless or until they can gain energy that they do not have.  They are also red-shifted to us.

Massive electrical currents, and polarized light (all across the full electromagnetic spectrum) are very good indications that we DO NOT live in a mostly-electrically neutral universe.

There is no dark matter, and no dark energy.  Instead, consider a known force, electromagnetism, as the real reason galaxies hold together as they are seen to do.

P.S.: I'm not finished with the presentation yet, so expect ongoing changes and improvements.  Every month, new observations provide un-anticipated  new phenomenon which seem to either support and/or be compatible with C-R theory-type cause or process.

Here are just some of the KEYS to look for when viewing the universe:

Excess Electrons should be freed-up from every matter-eating Black-Hole ^C-R while it is feeding.

There should be almost Total Positive Ionization of remnants ejected  from ALL ex-Black-Hole ^C-R phenomenon, novas, supernovas, Seyfert galaxies, quasars, and gamma ray bursts (GRB’s)

We should see increasing Red-shifts outward in ALL directions, but also limited increasing blue-shifts only towards the direction of the CENTER of the universe.

This center of this universe IS “The Great Attractor”.  Ironically, the Great Attractor is not attracting ANYTHING, but instead is clocking-faster than anywhere else in this universe. (In reality, there, at the Great Attractor, is the only area in this universe not slowed-down.)

There never was a Big Bang to start-this universe, at all.  The properties of Matter in this universe have ABSOLUTELY no dependence on starting conditions or from any consequences resulting from a Big Bang.

The 2.7K radiation value is only valid when seen or measured from earth.  If we could travel elsewhere in this universe, the background radiation WILL take on other values far from earth, depending on one’s viewing location in this universe.  If we could visit there, the 2.7K will measure cooler, closer-in towards the Great Attractor, and it will measure warmer as one travels further outward in any direction!

Also, this same 2.7K WILL NOT red-shift over time.  This background radiation is continually refreshed, and is continually replenished.  It is the AVERAGED-OUT, and smoothed-out result from all ongoing novae, supernovae, quasars, active galaxies, Seyfert galaxies, and gamma ray bursts (GRB’s).

ALL conditions seen occurring in the past in this universe are also STILL ongoing, at this time!!  We see the universe as it is, at it’s actual, real-time rate, not DOPPLER shifted from expansion!!!

Objects seen further-out towards the outer edges are actually slower than similar objects nearer to here, on earth.  That means that our universe is NOT ISOTROPIC, or that it is not the same in all directions. HINT: That is actually WHAT we do see.

Objects closer-in to the center (The Great Attractor) are less-slowed-down, (i.e., running faster), than objects here on earth.

Some of the above should be already apparent when viewing our universe, some might take a long time to verify.  If ANY of the above can be proved WRONG, then the C-R theory IS LIKELY to be False.

I welcome any interested reader's suggested links to sites opposing, supporting, or challenging any of the C-R theory concepts.  Any links to unnoticed new phenomenon with a possible link to the C-R theory concepts would also be appreciated.

I do understand that some of the ideas I have presented are new, but I still try to use existing language, wherever possible, to convey the concepts.  I will try to link to simple diagrams to illustrate the concepts, and compare them to similar, more well-known events.  If enough readers comment that they cannot understand the same area,  I will revise that section again, or try to simplify either the concept or the language.

The latest additions or revisions to the C-R theory are featured in the What’s New section, at the top of this page.

There are many videos available on line at YouTube, featuring comments on C-R theory concepts, unique observations and new ideas not yet available anywhere else.  All materials are free and can be viewed as many times as needed.  HINT: It may take many return visits for the full measure of the benefits of the C-R theory ideas to sink in, or take root.

There are more videos awaiting my editing so that they too can join the ones already available.

Please visit the blog section, to read my comments on the newest ideas, the latest comments on items I have noticed, and concepts so new they have not yet been incorporated into the theory.  That page is the most frequently updated section, with the newest items.

For the many international visitors, I also have the Completely-Recycling Theory (of the Entire Known Universe), a non-funny version of the Comedy-Recycling Theory.  That version should be more suitable for direct translation.

There are jokes, English language puns, and deliberate word mis-uses in some portions of the Comedy Recycling Theory that may make some portions of it unsuitable for direct, linear translation into other languages.

I have tried to be very clear in the theory to state where the C-R theory differs from mainstream theories, and chooses different solutions from standard thinking.  Most of the C-R theory new ideas are based on observations of nature from other, similar areas.

The only area I can think of that had no natural analogs would be the idea of the Neutral Zone ^C-R.  I can only state that the Black-Hole ^C-R idea needed this innovation to reconcile observations with the concept that the Black-Hole ^C-R never could collapse into the singularity, in part, because there always is a complete Active Zone ^C-R inside.  The practical usefulness of the Black-Hole ^C-R is so much more functional, and so fully necessary to recycling matter and energy, I would be much less satisfied with the C-R theory if I had no concept of the Neutral Zone ^C-R.

I do welcome reader comments and questions, and I do try to seriously answer those who have concerns.  Many of the C-R theory ideas are unique, and cannot be found elsewhere.  Feel free to adopt any of these concepts that you can accept, and carefully consider these ideas.  I expect that some of the C-R theory ideas are just too new and different to be accepted at first reading.  It has taken me 30 years to refine these ideas, to fully accept them, and to decide to advocate them, and share them freely with others.

[If you would: consider any of these new C-R theory ideas as homeless orphans, feel free to adopt them as your own, if you are willing.  I do not mind other people nurturing them, too.]

I am still learning from nature, and I am regularly finding new applications of the C-R theory ideas where the concepts seem to agree with what is seen.  I am hoping that eventually, others will start to see the applicability and usefulness of these concepts over extended time, even after they have initially rejected the C-R theory ideas as not agreeing what they have been previously taught.

If any of these ideas are incorrect, then you will know yet another way that nature does not work.  I do apologize that some of these ideas may need a billion and a half years to fully test them.  Possible future innovations may suggest quicker methods of determining whether nature has truly chosen to operate along the lines of reasoning incorporated into the C-R theory.

There are links to a reader survey, included after some of the text.  Please take the survey AFTER READING at least some of the C-R theory and express your opinions.  You can take the survey anonymously, if you do not wish to be identified.

There is also a link to contact the author.  This is the easiest way to contact me.  I do appreciate all who write in, and I will attempt to hand-craft an individual, detailed reply if your question or comment includes an e-mail address to reply to. (no generic, form letters are sent-out)

Thank you for visiting this site.  I hope that it has given you many new options to consider, and that you can try these new methods to understand our home, this universe.

Last revised Jan 22, 2010